UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS vs SMOKIN' HOT CHEDDAR FULLY COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS: 5
vs
SMOKIN' HOT CHEDDAR FULLY COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS | SMOKIN' HOT CHEDDAR FULLY COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 158 cal | 247 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS | SMOKIN' HOT CHEDDAR FULLY COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 10.5 MG | 2.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS | SMOKIN' HOT CHEDDAR FULLY COOKED SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 175 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 649 MG | 965 MG |