UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS vs BEEF 'N CHEDDAR HICKORY SMOKED 100% GRASS FED BEEF SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS: 5
vs
BEEF 'N CHEDDAR HICKORY SMOKED 100% GRASS FED BEEF SAUSAGE: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS | BEEF 'N CHEDDAR HICKORY SMOKED 100% GRASS FED BEEF SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 158 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 14.0 g | 16.7 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 22.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS | BEEF 'N CHEDDAR HICKORY SMOKED 100% GRASS FED BEEF SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 10.5 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED CHICKEN FRANKS | BEEF 'N CHEDDAR HICKORY SMOKED 100% GRASS FED BEEF SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 175 MG | 95 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 649 MG | 774 MG |