UNCURED BEEF FRANKS vs CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED BEEF FRANKS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 7
vs
CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 294 cal | 310 cal | |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 11.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 23.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 17.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | CHEDDAR HOT LINKS SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 588 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 10.6 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 762 MG |