UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTERS vs CAJUN STYLE HOT LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTERS: 3
vs
CAJUN STYLE HOT LINKS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTERS | CAJUN STYLE HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 268 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 23.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTERS | CAJUN STYLE HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | UNCURED BEEF FRANKFURTERS | CAJUN STYLE HOT LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 107 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 875 MG | 554 MG |