TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS vs CHICKEN TERIYAKI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN TERIYAKI wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS: 4
vs
CHICKEN TERIYAKI: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | CHICKEN TERIYAKI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 105 cal | 153 cal | |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 6.5 g | |
| Carbs | 10.5 g | 28.2 g | |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 1.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | CHICKEN TERIYAKI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 5.3 MG | 5.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | CHICKEN TERIYAKI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 88 MG | 8 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 202 MG | 439 MG |