TUSCAN STYLE PLANT-BASED GROUNDS WITH RUSTIC NOTES OF ROSEMARY vs CHICKEN PARMESAN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TUSCAN STYLE PLANT-BASED GROUNDS WITH RUSTIC NOTES OF ROSEMARY wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
TUSCAN STYLE PLANT-BASED GROUNDS WITH RUSTIC NOTES OF ROSEMARY: 7
vs
CHICKEN PARMESAN: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUSCAN STYLE PLANT-BASED GROUNDS WITH RUSTIC NOTES OF ROSEMARY | CHICKEN PARMESAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 224 cal | 257 cal | |
| Protein | 26.3 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 10.5 g | 20.4 g | |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 9.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUSCAN STYLE PLANT-BASED GROUNDS WITH RUSTIC NOTES OF ROSEMARY | CHICKEN PARMESAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 7.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUSCAN STYLE PLANT-BASED GROUNDS WITH RUSTIC NOTES OF ROSEMARY | CHICKEN PARMESAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 115 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 262 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 461 MG | 602 MG |