TUSCAN STYLE ITALIAN DRESSING vs MAPLE BACON ADJUSTABLE GRINDER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE BACON ADJUSTABLE GRINDER wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
TUSCAN STYLE ITALIAN DRESSING: 3
vs
MAPLE BACON ADJUSTABLE GRINDER: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUSCAN STYLE ITALIAN DRESSING | MAPLE BACON ADJUSTABLE GRINDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 25 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 25 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUSCAN STYLE ITALIAN DRESSING | MAPLE BACON ADJUSTABLE GRINDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUSCAN STYLE ITALIAN DRESSING | MAPLE BACON ADJUSTABLE GRINDER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 250 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 4.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 900 MG | 8,250 MG |