TUSCAN FLAIR SMALL PLATES vs SMITHFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMITHFIELD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TUSCAN FLAIR SMALL PLATES: 4
vs
SMITHFIELD: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUSCAN FLAIR SMALL PLATES | SMITHFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 209 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 20.9 g | |
| Carbs | 19.2 g | 7.0 g | |
| Fat | 18.0 g | 11.6 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUSCAN FLAIR SMALL PLATES | SMITHFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 46.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUSCAN FLAIR SMALL PLATES | SMITHFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 256 MG | 233 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 590 MG | 1,233 MG |