TUNA PLANT-BASED CALIFORNIA ROLL vs COCONUT SHRIMP ROLL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 12 nutrient categories
TUNA PLANT-BASED CALIFORNIA ROLL: 5
vs
COCONUT SHRIMP ROLL: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TUNA PLANT-BASED CALIFORNIA ROLL | COCONUT SHRIMP ROLL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 166 cal | 129 cal | |
| Protein | 2.0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 20.7 g | 18.1 g | |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TUNA PLANT-BASED CALIFORNIA ROLL | COCONUT SHRIMP ROLL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5.3 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TUNA PLANT-BASED CALIFORNIA ROLL | COCONUT SHRIMP ROLL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 19 MG | 12 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 43 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 257 MG | 175 MG |