TRADITIONAL WILD CAUGHT COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON vs MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL WILD CAUGHT COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL WILD CAUGHT COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON: 6
vs
MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL WILD CAUGHT COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON | MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 140 cal | 218 cal | |
| Protein | 22.8 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 13.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL WILD CAUGHT COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON | MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL WILD CAUGHT COLD-SMOKED SOCKEYE SALMON | MAPLE BOURBON ATLANTIC SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 368 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,088 MG | 310 MG |