TRADITIONAL SMOKED KING SALMON vs BLUE HILL BAY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL SMOKED KING SALMON wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL SMOKED KING SALMON: 6
vs
BLUE HILL BAY: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL SMOKED KING SALMON | BLUE HILL BAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 2.1 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL SMOKED KING SALMON | BLUE HILL BAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL SMOKED KING SALMON | BLUE HILL BAY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 439 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 613 MG | 616 MG |