TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN vs SEARED SIRLOIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SEARED SIRLOIN wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN: 1
vs
SEARED SIRLOIN: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | SEARED SIRLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 190 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 23.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 11.9 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | SEARED SIRLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | SEARED SIRLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 214 MG |