TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN vs GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN: 4
vs
GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 190 cal | 224 cal | |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 9.4 g | |
| Fat | 11.9 g | 11.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | GRASS-FED BEEF MEATLOAF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 282 MG |