TRADITIONAL REFRIED PINTO BEANS vs MARGARET HOLMES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARGARET HOLMES wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL REFRIED PINTO BEANS: 3
vs
MARGARET HOLMES: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL REFRIED PINTO BEANS | MARGARET HOLMES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 96 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 5.4 g | |
| Carbs | 10.5 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 5.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL REFRIED PINTO BEANS | MARGARET HOLMES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL REFRIED PINTO BEANS | MARGARET HOLMES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 193 MG | 369 MG |