TRADITIONAL REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS vs RUE FARMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS: 4
vs
RUE FARMS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS | RUE FARMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS | RUE FARMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 12.9 MG | 21.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL REDUCED FAT POTATO CHIPS | RUE FARMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 536 MG | 571 MG |