TRADITIONAL PULLED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN FULLY-COOKED CHILLED CHICKEN BREAST vs BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL PULLED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN FULLY-COOKED CHILLED CHICKEN BREAST wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL PULLED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN FULLY-COOKED CHILLED CHICKEN BREAST: 5
vs
BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL PULLED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN FULLY-COOKED CHILLED CHICKEN BREAST | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 119 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 1.4 g | |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL PULLED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN FULLY-COOKED CHILLED CHICKEN BREAST | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL PULLED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN FULLY-COOKED CHILLED CHICKEN BREAST | BEEF BARBACOA BEEF SLOW-COOKED IN A BLEND OF TOMATO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 536 MG | 343 MG |