TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS vs PORK BANGERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORK BANGERS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS: 2
vs
PORK BANGERS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS | PORK BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 164 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 13.2 g | |
| Carbs | 2.2 g | 9.2 g | |
| Fat | 37.8 g | 7.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS | PORK BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL PORK SAUSAGE LINKS | PORK BANGERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 733 MG | 436 MG |