TRADITIONAL PORK CRACKLINS vs CORNIE CONES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CORNIE CONES wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL PORK CRACKLINS: 3
vs
CORNIE CONES: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL PORK CRACKLINS | CORNIE CONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 50 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL PORK CRACKLINS | CORNIE CONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL PORK CRACKLINS | CORNIE CONES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 2,571 MG | 1,071 MG |