TRADITIONAL POLENTA vs MICROWAVEABLE ROASTED CHICKEN RICE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL POLENTA: 5
vs
MICROWAVEABLE ROASTED CHICKEN RICE: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL POLENTA | MICROWAVEABLE ROASTED CHICKEN RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 70 cal | 150 cal | |
| Protein | 2 g | 3.6 g | |
| Carbs | 15 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL POLENTA | MICROWAVEABLE ROASTED CHICKEN RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 7.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL POLENTA | MICROWAVEABLE ROASTED CHICKEN RICE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 11 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 129 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 310 MG | 471 MG |