TRADITIONAL GOURMET PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS vs FALAFEL SEASONED CHICKEN & QUINOA BALLS WITH SPINACH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL GOURMET PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL GOURMET PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS: 6
vs
FALAFEL SEASONED CHICKEN & QUINOA BALLS WITH SPINACH: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL GOURMET PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | FALAFEL SEASONED CHICKEN & QUINOA BALLS WITH SPINACH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 70 cal | 165 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 12.9 g | |
| Carbs | 7.8 g | 8.2 g | |
| Fat | 2.0 g | 9.4 g | |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL GOURMET PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | FALAFEL SEASONED CHICKEN & QUINOA BALLS WITH SPINACH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 9.4 MG | 4.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL GOURMET PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | FALAFEL SEASONED CHICKEN & QUINOA BALLS WITH SPINACH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 62 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 125 MG | 553 MG |