TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN vs CARNE ASADA MEDIUM SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN: 5
vs
CARNE ASADA MEDIUM SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | CARNE ASADA MEDIUM SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 20.2 g | 15.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | CARNE ASADA MEDIUM SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL FULLY-COOKED ROTISSERIE CHICKEN | CARNE ASADA MEDIUM SEASONED AND FULLY COOKED BEEF STEAK STRIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 345 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 702 MG | 440 MG |