TRADITIONAL EUROPEAN STYLE COOKIES vs KOKOPELLI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL EUROPEAN STYLE COOKIES wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL EUROPEAN STYLE COOKIES: 4
vs
KOKOPELLI: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL EUROPEAN STYLE COOKIES | KOKOPELLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 53.6 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL EUROPEAN STYLE COOKIES | KOKOPELLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL EUROPEAN STYLE COOKIES | KOKOPELLI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 196 MG | 0 MG |