TRADITIONAL BILTONG vs ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL BILTONG wins in 8 out of 13 nutrient categories
TRADITIONAL BILTONG: 8
vs
ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TRADITIONAL BILTONG | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 316 cal | 409 cal | |
| Protein | 54.4 g | 4.6 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 77.3 g | |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 9.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TRADITIONAL BILTONG | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 0 MG | 9.1 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TRADITIONAL BILTONG | ORIGINAL CRISPY MARSHMALLOW SQUARES BARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.3 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 789 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,386 MG | 477 MG |