TOXIC WASTE vs BUBBALOO GUM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TOXIC WASTE wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
TOXIC WASTE: 2
vs
BUBBALOO GUM: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TOXIC WASTE | BUBBALOO GUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 303 cal | 293 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 69.0 g | 74.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TOXIC WASTE | BUBBALOO GUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TOXIC WASTE | BUBBALOO GUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 28 MG | 0 MG |