TORN RANCH vs MARSHMALLOW COATED WITH MILK CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TORN RANCH wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
TORN RANCH: 6
vs
MARSHMALLOW COATED WITH MILK CHOCOLATE: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TORN RANCH | MARSHMALLOW COATED WITH MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 360 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 65 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 9.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TORN RANCH | MARSHMALLOW COATED WITH MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TORN RANCH | MARSHMALLOW COATED WITH MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 54 MG | 0 MG |