TORN & GLASSER vs COLD WATERFALLS ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COLD WATERFALLS ALMONDS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TORN & GLASSER: 3
vs
COLD WATERFALLS ALMONDS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TORN & GLASSER | COLD WATERFALLS ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 450 cal | 488 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 16.3 g | |
| Carbs | 70 g | 39.5 g | |
| Fat | 22.5 g | 32.6 g | |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TORN & GLASSER | COLD WATERFALLS ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TORN & GLASSER | COLD WATERFALLS ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 112 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 4.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 512 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 400 MG | 314 MG |