TOPS vs MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TOPS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
TOPS: 3
vs
MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TOPS | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 342 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 76.3 g | 85.7 g | |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TOPS | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TOPS | MARSHMALLOW CHICKS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 39 MG | 36 MG |