TOKYO BENTO A COMBINATION OF SPICY TUNA ROLL vs OKLAHOMA ROLL WR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TOKYO BENTO A COMBINATION OF SPICY TUNA ROLL wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
TOKYO BENTO A COMBINATION OF SPICY TUNA ROLL: 8
vs
OKLAHOMA ROLL WR: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TOKYO BENTO A COMBINATION OF SPICY TUNA ROLL | OKLAHOMA ROLL WR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 140 cal | 159 cal | |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 3.9 g | |
| Carbs | 17.4 g | 22.5 g | |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 2.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TOKYO BENTO A COMBINATION OF SPICY TUNA ROLL | OKLAHOMA ROLL WR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TOKYO BENTO A COMBINATION OF SPICY TUNA ROLL | OKLAHOMA ROLL WR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 21 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 150 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 431 MG | 385 MG |