TIME HONORED COOKING CHICKEN FAT vs ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
TIME HONORED COOKING CHICKEN FAT: 1
vs
ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TIME HONORED COOKING CHICKEN FAT | ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 929 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 73.3 g | |
| Fat | 100 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TIME HONORED COOKING CHICKEN FAT | ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TIME HONORED COOKING CHICKEN FAT | ORIGINAL BALSAMIC GLACE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 67 MG |