THORNTONS vs ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
THORNTONS: 3
vs
ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THORNTONS | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 514 cal | |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 8.1 g | |
| Carbs | 54.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 31.0 g | 29.7 g | |
| Fiber | 4.8 g | 2.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THORNTONS | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | THORNTONS | ROASTED CALIFORNIA ALMONDS COVERED IN MILK CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 162 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 378 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 95 MG | 68 MG |