THIRST QUENCHER vs SAC SAC GRAPE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THIRST QUENCHER wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
THIRST QUENCHER: 4
vs
SAC SAC GRAPE: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THIRST QUENCHER | SAC SAC GRAPE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 cal | 53 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 5.8 g | 13.0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THIRST QUENCHER | SAC SAC GRAPE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 10.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | THIRST QUENCHER | SAC SAC GRAPE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 4 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 12 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 23 MG |