THINS PRETZELS vs KETTLE CLASSICS REDUCED FAT CRUNCHY POTATO CHIPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THINS PRETZELS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
THINS PRETZELS: 3
vs
KETTLE CLASSICS REDUCED FAT CRUNCHY POTATO CHIPS: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THINS PRETZELS | KETTLE CLASSICS REDUCED FAT CRUNCHY POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 78.6 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THINS PRETZELS | KETTLE CLASSICS REDUCED FAT CRUNCHY POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 21.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | THINS PRETZELS | KETTLE CLASSICS REDUCED FAT CRUNCHY POTATO CHIPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,714 MG | 429 MG |