THICK CUT CRISPBREADS vs GARDEN OF EATIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
THICK CUT CRISPBREADS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
THICK CUT CRISPBREADS: 4
vs
GARDEN OF EATIN: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THICK CUT CRISPBREADS | GARDEN OF EATIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 500 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 53.6 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THICK CUT CRISPBREADS | GARDEN OF EATIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | THICK CUT CRISPBREADS | GARDEN OF EATIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 750 MG | 232 MG |