THICK CUT CRISPBREADS vs OLD LONDON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OLD LONDON wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
THICK CUT CRISPBREADS: 2
vs
OLD LONDON: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | THICK CUT CRISPBREADS | OLD LONDON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 512 cal | 353 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 55.8 g | 70.6 g | |
| Fat | 27.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 11.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | THICK CUT CRISPBREADS | OLD LONDON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | THICK CUT CRISPBREADS | OLD LONDON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 581 MG | 0 MG |