TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS vs CANNELLINI ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANNELLINI ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS: 3
vs
CANNELLINI ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS | CANNELLINI ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 cal | 92 cal | |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 5.4 g | |
| Carbs | 18.5 g | 13.9 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 4.6 g | 4.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS | CANNELLINI ORGANIC LOW SODIUM BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 38 MG | 73 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 415 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 377 MG | 88 MG |