TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS vs CANNELLINI BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS: 4
vs
CANNELLINI BEANS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS | CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 cal | 77 cal | |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 5.4 g | |
| Carbs | 18.5 g | 15.4 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 4.6 g | 4.6 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS | CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TEXAS STYLE REFRIED CHARRO BEANS PINTO BEANS | CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 38 MG | 46 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 415 MG | 208 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 377 MG | 200 MG |