TEXAS STYLE BORRACHO BEANS PINTO BEANS vs CANNELLINI BEANS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANNELLINI BEANS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
TEXAS STYLE BORRACHO BEANS PINTO BEANS: 3
vs
CANNELLINI BEANS: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TEXAS STYLE BORRACHO BEANS PINTO BEANS | CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 69 cal | 67 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 11.5 g | 12.2 g | |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TEXAS STYLE BORRACHO BEANS PINTO BEANS | CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TEXAS STYLE BORRACHO BEANS PINTO BEANS | CANNELLINI BEANS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 262 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 331 MG | 33 MG |