TERIYAKI QUICK CATCH TUNA BOWLS vs CHICKEN MARSALA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN MARSALA wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
TERIYAKI QUICK CATCH TUNA BOWLS: 4
vs
CHICKEN MARSALA: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TERIYAKI QUICK CATCH TUNA BOWLS | CHICKEN MARSALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 159 cal | 101 cal | |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 9.2 g | |
| Carbs | 24.7 g | 12.6 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 3.1 g | |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 1.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TERIYAKI QUICK CATCH TUNA BOWLS | CHICKEN MARSALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TERIYAKI QUICK CATCH TUNA BOWLS | CHICKEN MARSALA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 46 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 188 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 394 MG | 236 MG |