TERIYAKI HAND-SEASONED ATLANTIC SALMON FILLETS vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TERIYAKI HAND-SEASONED ATLANTIC SALMON FILLETS: 3
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TERIYAKI HAND-SEASONED ATLANTIC SALMON FILLETS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 19.3 g | 15.5 g | |
| Carbs | 5.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TERIYAKI HAND-SEASONED ATLANTIC SALMON FILLETS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TERIYAKI HAND-SEASONED ATLANTIC SALMON FILLETS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 12 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 362 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 386 MG | 571 MG |