TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS vs CRUNCHY COCONUT CLUSTERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS: 5
vs
CRUNCHY COCONUT CLUSTERS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS | CRUNCHY COCONUT CLUSTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 60 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 10 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS | CRUNCHY COCONUT CLUSTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS | CRUNCHY COCONUT CLUSTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 600 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,533 MG | 167 MG |