TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS vs BEEF BILTONG SLICED SNACKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS: 4
vs
BEEF BILTONG SLICED SNACKS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS | BEEF BILTONG SLICED SNACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 60 g | 57.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 33.3 g | 2.3 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS | BEEF BILTONG SLICED SNACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TENDER CRACKLINS TRADITIONAL PORK SKINS | BEEF BILTONG SLICED SNACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,533 MG | 1,607 MG |