TASTY BRAND vs MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TASTY BRAND wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
TASTY BRAND: 4
vs
MARSHMALLOWS: 1
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TASTY BRAND | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 345 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 78.3 g | 82.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TASTY BRAND | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 260.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TASTY BRAND | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 174 MG | 103 MG |