TASTABLE vs NATURAL DECADENCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL DECADENCE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
TASTABLE: 3
vs
NATURAL DECADENCE: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TASTABLE | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 414 cal | 211 cal | |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 5.3 g | |
| Carbs | 46.4 g | 26.3 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 10.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TASTABLE | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.1 MG | 2.1 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TASTABLE | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 70 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 105 MG |