TAIL-ON vs NATURAL COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 12 nutrient categories
TAIL-ON: 3
vs
NATURAL COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL-ON | NATURAL COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 22.4 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL-ON | NATURAL COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL-ON | NATURAL COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 429 MG | 259 MG |