TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP vs WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP: 6
vs
WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 74 cal | 134 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 22.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 4.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL ON COOKED SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 27 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 367 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 168 MG | 76 MG |