TAIL-OFF vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
TAIL-OFF: 4
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL-OFF | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 24.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL-OFF | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL-OFF | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.1 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 619 MG | 541 MG |