TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 4
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 59 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 16 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 329 MG | 329 MG | Tie |