TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP vs BAY SCALLOPS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 6
vs
BAY SCALLOPS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | BAY SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 59 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | BAY SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 3.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | BAY SCALLOPS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 18 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 16 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 329 MG | 142 MG |