TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP vs WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP: 5
vs
WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER FILLETS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 96 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 12.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 3 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TAIL-OFF COOKED SHRIMP | WILD CAUGHT FLOUNDER FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 159 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 224 MG | 80 MG |