SWEET & TANGY POLYNESIAN GLAZING & DIPPING vs KELIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET & TANGY POLYNESIAN GLAZING & DIPPING wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
SWEET & TANGY POLYNESIAN GLAZING & DIPPING: 6
vs
KELIS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET & TANGY POLYNESIAN GLAZING & DIPPING | KELIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 278 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 5.6 g | |
| Carbs | 46.7 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 8.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET & TANGY POLYNESIAN GLAZING & DIPPING | KELIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET & TANGY POLYNESIAN GLAZING & DIPPING | KELIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 433 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,067 MG | 1,611 MG |